On March 31, 2004 the world was shocked as they witnessed images of four burned bodies hanging from a bridge in Fallujah, Iraq. We were told that these men were American contractors hired to secure food deliveries. The interesting thing was that the families of these men were actually told a different story. They were told that they were hired as a special military detailed to protect Paul Bremer, head of the Coalition Provisional Authority. Somebody wasn’t getting the story straight.
These four bodies were being used to rally support for the American effort in Iraq. The supporters of the war used the images to vilify the enemy and to call anyone who questioned the war as unpatriotic. The truth is that these men wouldn’t have even been in harms way if the administration had relied on American soldiers rather than military mercenaries to carry out their missions.
It turns out that the United States has about 150,000 American military in Iraq. But, we also have almost 100,000 American "contractors" in Iraq as well. And, the most aggressive of these contractors are from a company called Blackwater. The men that were hanging on that bridge back in 2004 were contractors from this company.
Journalist Jeremy Scahill has a new book out called "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army." In this book he illuminates some of the mysteries surrounding this company. He tells us how Erik Prince, a radical right-wing Christian multimillionaire controls 20,000 troops, a military base and a fleet of 20 aircraft, but most people have never heard of his organization. Even after the macabre hanging on the bridge in 2004, people still don’t know that those men worked for Blackwater. Or, if they did, they didn’t know that those men were actually highly trained military men. Jerko "Jerry" Zovko, Wesley Batalona, Michael Teague and Stephen "Scott" Helvenston were in Iraq and they were soldiers, not contractors.
Stephen "Scott" Helvenston was not only a Navy Seal, he was a Navy Seal trainer. Michael Teague was a decorated 12-year Army veteran who had served in Afghanistan, Panama and Grenada and with a Special Operations helicopter unit nicknamed "Night Stalkers." Jerry Zovko spoke Arabic and several other languages well enough to chat with the staff in the small hotel where he lived. Wesley Batalona was also an ex-military man an Army Ranger with experience in Panama and the first Gulf War. The point is that these four men had more military experience than many of the soldiers occupying the country at the time. So, to call them contractors actually made them sound more like innocent civilians caught in the crosshairs of the terrorists who hate everything American including these poor guys who could never have provoked anyone by merely guarding the food supply to the Iraqis. At least that is what the press reports tended to imply.
But, in Jeremy Scahill’s book we see another side of this company: Blackwater. It turns out that Blackwater isn’t under the military code of conduct. The company argues that private contractors shouldn’t be subject to military laws, because they are a private contracting firm. They are actually paid through the state department, and other government departments instead of the Pentagon which stands to bolster their argument. But, they act like a roving band of mercenaries with only Erik Prince to answer to.
It turns out that the four men on the bridge had signed quite extensive contracts relieving Blackwater of almost any responsibility in the case of their deaths. But, the four families have gathered their forces anyway in order to sue Blackwater in Civil Court. It turns out that the detailed contract these men signed with Blackwater detailed how the men should be protected on their mission as well. At first Blackwater didn’t worry much about that detail, because Blackwater claimed that the details of the incident would be a military secret that could put the American forces in harms way. So, the fact that the Blackwater employees were traveling in two jeeps without the aid of a rear gunner was kept from the families for nearly two years. This action actually should void the contract and the families of these men are taking the case to court.
But the case may not be a slam-dunk just yet. Did you ever wonder what Kenneth Star is doing these days? You know, the prosecutor who spent nearly five years investigating the Clinton’s real estate dealings and only was able to catch Bill Clinton lying about an affair with an intern at the White House. Well, he is working as a lawyer defending Blackwater from these poor families who have lost the ones they love through the negligence of Blackwater. (It is interesting how he always find himself on the side of evil in these matters.)
It turns out that Blackwater is sparing no expense to defend its right to be above the law. They claim that they don’t need to obey the military code of conduct because they are a private firm. They also claim that they shouldn’t be prosecuted in a criminal court, because they deal with military secrets that could put our troops in jeopardy. They also claim that they can not be prosecuted for any of the actions that they have taken in Iraq under the Iraqi courts, because they are Americans. In fact they seem to have an excuse for almost every possible way they that they could be held accountable for their crimes.
Crimes!? Yes, Crimes. There are many reports in Iraq detailing the antics of the "Blackwater Guys." They see themselves as above the law. They have reportedly shot at people first, then ask the questions later. Is this the way that America should be building relations with the Iraqis, or others in the Middle East.
Yes, Blackwater isn’t just in Iraq. In fact, they go to the places where the US hasn’t athorized troop deployment yet. Blackwater can go to these places because they are a private company. And, a private company can go wherever they please. Talk about loopholes. Blackwater has found the right combination of circumstances that they have made war a profitable enterprise once again. And the soldiers aren’t the ones getting all that cash. Blackwater charges $950 per day per soldier to the US government, and they pay the majority of their mercenaries $350 per day. The rest of that money seems to go into overhead or Erik Prince’s pocket. We don’t know for sure because that detail is a secret that might jeopardize the safety of the troops in the field, or maybe Erik Prince from his mercenary soldiers.
If you want to know more about Blackwater, then maybe you should read the book. Or, you could listen to Jeremy Scahill interviewed by Terry Gross on Fresh Air. The podcast and audio are in the archives at npr.org.
__________________________

It is not surprising
to see one hired gun(Kenneth Star) defending a company who provides hired guns. So they aren't accountable to the military because they are civilians but they aren't accountable to civilians because they do contract work for the military but are paid by the state department? Doesn't this sound like a typical Alberto Gonzales argument for ignoring the Constitution?
__________________________Work and struggle and never accept an evil that you can change -- Andre Gide
And, They aren't
the only contractors/mercenaries out there.
Thanks for posting this
There are so many bad angles on this mess aren't there? It is still hard for me to imagine that we got railroaded into this. I really, really thought we had learned from Vietnam. I would love to know the truth about what we are doing there. Is this about oil? Is this about the contract put out on pops? Why do we call this democracy again?
__________________________"I have no mouth and I must scream" Harlan Ellison
Ronny, Donny and Dick are at Fault
We got into this mess with Ronald Reagan’s grand idea of privatization. Don’t you know that everything works better when it is privatized and profit becomes the most important objective? In health care it leads to more profits for hospitals and higher costs for patients. So, why would it work the same way in the military?
So, when the draft was cancelled and the Soviet Union fell we had the moral responsibility to cut our military forces. But, the ex-military guys set up alternative companies and organizations. They wanted to do work related to their training and skill sets. Obviously mercenary soldiers would qualify. However, if there weren’t any customers it wouldn’t matter. But, the first Iraq War offered an opportunity for these “war contractors.†Soon, Rumfeld and Chenney realized that there were some useful loopholes with the use of these “contractors.â€Â
I have two answers
I always have two answers to the "myth" that privatization is more efficient, USPS, and Social Security. Ask any person dependent upon their social security checks when the last time was that it did not show upon the day it was due. There is no corporation in America that could deliver this service as reliably as they have for as long as they have and as cheaply as they do it. And go to either FEDEX or UPS and ask them how much it would cost to mail a letter to Juno Alaska from Brownsville Texas and see if they can come by your house, pick it up and get it delivered for 39 cents. Good Luck!! There is nothing that American corporations do that our government wouldn't do better and at a cost savings because they are not profit motivated. Their only motivation is to deliver a quality product to the consumer. I know they aren't perfect, but compared to corporate America they sometimes seem that way.
__________________________Work and struggle and never accept an evil that you can change -- Andre Gide
Add US Health Care
If Privatization made the more efficient least expensive system, then US Health care would be the best in the World. I know that some people might argue that, but a recent study shows that the US system is the most expensive of all industrial countries. Why? Because of supply and demand. People want to live forever, and the wealthy are willing to pay all of their income in order to do just that. But, the system is unfair, because this demand drives up the cost to the average person. Without some limitation the cost will continue to go up until the dying man has spent all of his money to beat death to no avail.
Food would behave the same way, but the government subsidizes the farmers to bring the cost down in the US. A starving person will spend his last dollar to eat.
Why do you think
the American people don't get this. I remember when Ross Perot was running for president so many people thought that bringing a corporate mentality to Washington would make the government run better. Do people just not know what their government does for them everyday? You know in Europe people love their governments and distrust the private sector. What do they see that Americans don't?
__________________________Work and struggle and never accept an evil that you can change -- Andre Gide
Culture!
Culture is what underlies our perception of the world. If we are raised to believe that government abuses its subjects, then government will always remain susceptable to that characterization. If we were taught that government is a tool to make life better, but should be respected then you would have Europe. If we were taught that without an authoritarian control there would be disorder and chaos, then we would have monarchy or another form of authoritarian government.
All of these options have advantages and disadvantages, and as a culture we believe that we have chosen the best option.