<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.diatribune.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Diatribune - Hillary’s Favorite Fallacies - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.diatribune.com/hillary%E2%80%99s-favorite-fallacies</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Hillary’s Favorite Fallacies&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Hillary’s Favorite Fallacies</title>
 <link>http://www.diatribune.com/hillary%E2%80%99s-favorite-fallacies</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Abstract.&lt;/em&gt;  Any student of logic has to be astonished that the five most important arguments being advanced on behalf of Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination are fallacious.  Some of them, such as that, since she prevailed over Obama in certain large states, such as Pennsylvania, Obama would be unable to win those states in the general election, are even being featured on the front page of &lt;em&gt;The New York Times&lt;/em&gt;.  But that Obama lost to Hillary in the primary does not mean he would lose to John McCain in the general election.  The best reasons for Hillary could not pass scrutiny in a freshman course on critical thinking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.diatribune.com/hillary%E2%80%99s-favorite-fallacies&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.diatribune.com/hillary%E2%80%99s-favorite-fallacies#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.diatribune.com/diatribune-publishing/politics/abortion/clinton-hillary">Clinton, Hillary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.diatribune.com/diatribune-publishing/politics/elections/primaries">primaries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.diatribune.com/diatribune-publishing/politics/abortion/obama-barack">Obama, Barack</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:21:58 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jim Fetzer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3531 at http://www.diatribune.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
