<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.diatribune.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Diatribune - no more foreign aid institutions. . . it&amp;#039;s china - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.diatribune.com/no-more-foreign-aid-institutions-its-china</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;no more foreign aid institutions. . . it&#039;s china&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>no more foreign aid institutions. . . it&#039;s china</title>
 <link>http://www.diatribune.com/no-more-foreign-aid-institutions-its-china</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Foreign aid; development assistance; foreign investment; these terms are now gaining another synonym: rogue aid. In an excerpt from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3732&quot;&gt;Foreign Policy Blog&lt;/a&gt;, rogue aiders are defined as such, &quot;Because their goal is not to help other countries develop. Rather, they are motivated by a desire to further their own national interests, advance an ideological agenda, or sometimes line their own pockets. Rogue aid providers couldn&#039;t care less about the long-term well-being of the population of the countries they &#039;aid&#039;.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.diatribune.com/no-more-foreign-aid-institutions-its-china&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.diatribune.com/no-more-foreign-aid-institutions-its-china#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.diatribune.com/diatribune-publishing/politics/internationalrelations/asia/china">China</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 05:57:26 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>scoutbanana</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">515 at http://www.diatribune.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
