John Edwards is Visiting My South

Marks, Mississippi. Marianna Arkansas. Memphis Tennessee. These are the first stops for John Edwards on a special journey that begins July 16 in New Orleans, goes up the Mississippi, across to the Rust Belt of the upper Ohio Valley states and ends in Appalachia. John Edwards is highlighting poverty in this country: The Road to One America Tour.

Part I of that tour, the Mississippi Delta, is where I was born. It is the flattest place in the U.S., maybe on earth. And two colors: Green and black, stretched around the meandering twists of the Mississippi River. If you have Mapquest or Google maps, look at the aerial view, and you’ll see what I mean. That black land is fertile.

My granddad used to say that if you had enough rain – but not too much – you could stick a piece of wood in the ground and it would sprout and grow without further assistance. He was wrong, of course. Over some two centuries, growing things there took a lot of help, mostly in human flesh and bone. Before the Civil War, that work was mostly gotten from slaves. In some of our lifetimes, that work was done by sharecroppers and tenant farmers, a very tiny bit of which remains today.

My granddad did that in the beginning. You don’t own anything. The owner gives you a place to live (more on that below) in the Spring. Seed. Maybe a mule. You plant, tend, and harvest, hoping that enough rain comes without floods. Your other needs are bought on credit, to be paid when your harvest comes in. Take the harvest and sell it, give the owner the lion’s share of the money, most of the rest to pay the other bills. Maybe just a bit left over to get through the winter. Repeat.

The contrast between the few who were wealthy and the many who were poor was and is striking. Energies that might have been directed toward rebellion were kept in line as they are today, through fear, and deflection of frustration onto a scapegoat of one sort or another. After Secession and the Civil War, which few poor whites had voted for, the great number of poor whites were kept in check by deflecting them toward racial hatred and fear of former slaves. Black citizens had few reasons to trust anyone white, and even fewer ways to have a different sort of life.

Many of the poorest folks on the Delta lived in places like the lines of small mustard yellow houses that used to line the great cotton farms outside West Memphis, Arkansas. If you got too old or too sick to work, well, you might be turned out. Only the luckiest folks got ahead of this curve.

My grandfather got that slim chance at a better life. He was lucky enough to be sent to school, instead of having to work in the fields all the time. He didn’t marry until he was 26, and he managed somehow to get out of the cycle. He bought the tiniest piece of land – much more possible because he was white - and besides farming, he built things for people. I have a copper lamp he made with scraps from some job he took on, and he built my grandmother a fine, small farmhouse that still stands strong some 80 years later.

My granddad was lucky in other things: Times were changing and the people who had lived, however long, however well, working the land for others, were turned out by machinery. Many went north. Henry Louis Gates, Jr.’s book Colored People relates that story very well.

The Mississippi Delta is still the home of many poor people, and many people slipping into poverty. There are few opportunities, and little prospect for improvement. Poor people and people worried about their rising poverty are still being manipulated by fear and having their frustrations deflected onto other issues. Last year I had a short, sad conversation with a retired man in Tennessee who was worried about the “G D immigrants coming in and taking what’s ours.” Not three hours earlier I had read an antique poster dated many decades earlier that made similar arguments during a time of massive crop failures.

It strikes me today that sharecropping was the middle bead on a heavy necklace, with slavery on one end, and “freedom” in poverty without opportunity on the other. Our country still wears that necklace. Today’s poor are also locked into an uncertain future with little job security, a fear of bad health, and the burden of hard debt over head. That’s the lot of so many people in our country, slipping into worse shape, falling toward poverty, into deeper financial troubles and despair. It’s a part of America that I don’t think people in Washington DC understand.

John Edwards, alone among the candidates, seems to understand the roots of poverty, and how our citizens, however poor or well off, need to be bound together. I hope you’ll follow his journey, and see what he has to say.
__________________________

I think that Lyndon

I think that Lyndon Johnson's "War On Poverty" proved that we will never eliminate poverty in this country until we are willing to engage in an honest and open discussion about the distribution of wealth. We could eliminate poverty in one stroke just by passing legislation that guarantees a living wage to all Americans (something George McGovern advocated)and redistributes the wealth downward. All other measures just pay lip service to the problem without providing solutions.

__________________________

Work and struggle and never accept an evil that you can change -- Andre Gide

Why does a large percentage

Why does a large percentage of america fetishize inequality as proof of virtue!!! I don't know that people would put it quite this way, but I think many people base their thinking on the idea that inequality is the desired outcome of society, not an indication that society needs some reworking.

__________________________

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

I would agree with that.

I would agree with that. That is why there is so much idol worship in this country for people like Bill Gates. It reinforces that whole idea that inequality is working. It is all very bizarre to me.

__________________________

Work and struggle and never accept an evil that you can change -- Andre Gide

Some refer to holy

Some refer to holy writ:

"the poor you have always with you"
"blessed are the poor"

Of course, the same holy writ also makes caustic comments about wealthier folks who simply told poor persons to "be warmed and filled" but did nothing to help the poor. . .

And then, of course, there is the interpretation of Calvin's institutes with wealth being seen as a sign of God's favor (not sure Calvin would like that).

And beyond Calvin, the idea of Social Darwinism is a popular one, even among people who are disdainful of Darwin's actual ideas on evolution: Wealth is a sign of greater "fitness", that you are better, more apt, more skillful, a better level of humanity if you are wealthy.

I keep thinking of the terrible things written on newborn babies' records not so long ago: "piss poor protoplasm".

The physician writers weren't talking about health.

I disagree. Johnson's War on

I disagree. Johnson's War on Poverty was a great success in some respects: Head Start for one (despite many right wing attempts to discount its success).

However the central problem of the War on Poverty was the War in Vietnam. Like our current war in Iraq, it absorbed money - and more important to that day, it absorbed young adults. Thus any attempts at a large national improvement effort, or national discussion about poverty were distinctly back-burnered until Vietnam was settled.

Well, we were still fighting about Vietnam in 2000. How many years will we be arguing about Iraq and its inevitable sequels?

I know that Johnson had some

I know that Johnson had some success with the War on Poverty but it was literally intended to wipe out poverty in this country and it never happened. I can't accurately say how much the war in Vietnam effected his domestic agenda, but Johnson was one of the most successful presidents in history at getting bills he supported through Congress. I think if you read Daniel Patrick Moynihan's "Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding" you will see bureaucratic problems that contributed to the failure as well. The problem I think with programslike Head Start is for all of the good they do and they do a lot of good, they are another band-aid approach to solving a much greater social problem. We keep putting band-aids like food stamps, housing subsidies, free lunch programs, minimum wage, etc on the problem and we still have people in the wealthiest country in the world who live in great poverty. There is something really wrong with the fact that we have corporate CEO's making 400 times what the average worker makes now and people like Bill Gates and the Waltons are wealthy beyond comprehension while some people in South Texas live in dirt floor shacks.We need to start a real honest dialog about the distribution of wealth in this country if we want to end poverty in America instead of coming up with new band-aids.

__________________________

Work and struggle and never accept an evil that you can change -- Andre Gide