cross-posted on Raising Kaine
Senator Clinton's negatives are now to 52% according to Gallup, the highest of any candidate in the human history of the Democratic Party. Up from 46% about nine months ago. The more money she spends the more her negatives go up. And with all due respect, John Edwards, who recently cited Paris Hilton as poster-child for his "two Americas" pitch is drifting into Triple A. A few of the other Democrats who want to be President are so forgettable that most can’t even remember their names.
In contrast, Mitt Romney is beginning to boom and will continue to do. Romney is smart as paint, is a masterful administrator and is very rich. Any of these Democratic contenders against Romney will fail. But this time we approach a catastrophic failure. It will be the Democrats fourth total failure since Eisenhower.
It is quite possible that the Democratic Party itself cannot survive such a failure. I’m sensing entrenched retreat: Nihilism, born of desperation, is beginning to poison the major blogs and some of the more original bloggers are dropping out. This will further sink the Democrats' chances.
Ships come and go in such an uncertain political environment – last week Ron Paul, this week Colin Powell and the week before, Al Gore. Then they pass on into the night and fog.
Wes Clark is still here. He says consistently that he has not ruled out a run in ’08. Wes Clark, as Dark Horse, can retrieve this and now he may be the only hope for the Democrats.
We have been hearing from General Clark quite a bit, but you have to want to listen. He’s not on the Big Screen; he has no Hollywood poster child like Edwards and no mangled and misbegotten "quotes" from Lincoln of things never said (grabbed from the Internet) like Gore. He is right on the facts and accurate in his historical perspective. He is precise and perfect in presentation. And he’s been going on and on about Iran, like the Ancient Mariner, to anyone who will listen; in the Huffington Post, on Amy Goodman’s Democracy Now, at the 92nd St. YMCA in New York City, on Fox news and now as a commentator on MSNBC. He’s at StopIranWar.com, alone among the Democrats to warn of impending neocon-inspired invasion of Iran.
Like those who denounced Churchill as crying wolf, Rove & Company have called Clark’s claim about a pending Iran invasion absurd, and most of the Democratic contenders hope this will pass them by as well, as they hoped Iraq would. But this weekend in the NYTs, we are told that Vice President Cheney and his incompetent war cabinet have been pushing for strikes against Iran all along. Joe Lieberman, who used to be a Democrat and sometimes thinks he still is, is openly pushing for strikes on Iran. The Republican right is calling for the "nuclear option" as it has been since the beginning of the Iraq conflict.
Only General Clark speaks up.
Condi Rice, the Administration's Incredible Shrinking Woman, is said to prefer conversation rather than bombing Iran, but the NYTs reports that " . . . Mr. Cheney believed that Ms. Rice’s diplomatic strategy was failing, and that by next spring Mr. Bush might have to decide whether to take military action."
Cheney is incapable of seeing warfare as anything beyond revenge and dominance. He is the Anti-Eisenhower; he has a mind which rebels from strategic thinking and planning. They still haven’t avenged the Ayatollah Khomeini and the taking of American hostages in 1979. It will be the administration’s last bit of business as they finally close the door that Ronald Reagan opened.
Only General Clark and a few others – Eric Massa, Andrew Horne of Tennessee and Jon Soltz; all Democrats and military officers – are speaking up. But they are building a new Democratic Party and General Clark was elementary in organizing and husbanding its awakening.
I was pleased to hear on NPR this week and again on NBC over the weekend, a tribute to Jim Webb, the new Senator from Virginia, for Father’s Day. He talked about fathers and sons and the tradition of military service which has gone back in his Virginia family to before the American Revolution.
How times have changed in the last two years. The rise of Jim Webb, Joe Sestak, Tammy Duckworth, Andrew Horne and a whole rash of Fighting Dems; the kind of solid-stock heartland politicians like New Hampshire's Carol Shea-Porter and Arkansas's Woody Anderson that we haven't seen since the day of JFK. Clark tirelessly supported these candidates throughout '06 political season. They are forming a new Democratic sensibility.
They bring a new and different attitude to the Democratic Party - a positive attitude.
This new Democratic sensibility is the best fit for our country at the beginning of the new century. My feeling is that it is unfortunately our own internal energy - the pseudo-Republicans of the DLC in particular and what Democratic strategist Mudcat Saunders recently called the Metropolitan Opera branch of the Democratic Party - that is sinking these efforts, striving to return to pre-9/11 conditions. Any of these new people: Tammy Duckworth, Jim Webb, Eric Massa, Joe Sestak, Wes Clark, would awaken American and beat the likes of Mitt Romney hands down. I'm hoping that Katrina Swett and/or Jay Buckey, who are both running against Senator John Sununu here in NH, can follow Shea-Porter’s lead and marshal this new Democratic sensibility in New England and bring it forward.
The Democrats have to get serious now or it could soon be too late: As said; Romney is smart as paint and he is a fantastic manager. But sending the country to such a detached manager as Romney, who was key to the progress of financial institutions like Bain & Company and Bain Capital, would be sending it into receivership.
The crisis which begins our century could well be at hand right now as Hamas takes the Gaza Strip. This victory by the radical force in Palestine will empower a new generation of revolutionary, anti-Western young people. As General Clark said, Gaza could now be a breeding ground for Al Qaeda connected radicals. It is the beginning of a new framework of discussion and diplomacy and it is possible now for warfare to spread and alliances to harden.
I hope General Clark continues to speak up. Although I appreciate the leadership in the House and the Senate, I'm afraid that Harry Reid is starting on the wrong note: This is not the time to go after General Petraeus with personal criticism. It encourages a negative mood for the Democrats. And it is wrong to criticize soldiers on the ground as "detached" and "incompetent" as Reid has recently done and shows an intrinsic misunderstanding of the matrix of power in our country.
I feel only General Clark can forcefully and effectively shape the issues now for the Democrats and prevent the temptation of this kind of "shadow" criticism - the thing which could drive the Democrats to nihilism and irrelevance, which at this point could lead our country to great disaster.
In the Wall Street Journal this week Reagan speech-writer Peggy Noonan all but called for a third party. David Broder of the Washington Post actually called for third party last week.
Mainstream conservatives like Noonan and Broder are getting the idea: There are always other options. One such attractive option is New York mayor Mike Bloomberg, who said he would start his own third party if the standing parties can’t come up with something original and dynamic. Bloomberg is nothing if not dynamic himself and he does speak to the heart of New York City as great mayors like Ed Koch and Fiorello LaGuardia did. But he is enigmatic as well and is said to have all but sponsored Lieberman’s mischief in third-party politics in Connecticut in ’06. Bloomberg could well bring the same Lieberman mischief to the national stage. Coincidentally, Mayor Mike is up here in New Hampshire this weekend. Just visiting, he says.
Bloomberg has bi-partisan support, and political venerables like Ham Jordan, former chief for Jimmy Carter and Angus King, former Independent Governor of Maine, who have been calling for a third party all year, keep suggesting his name..
It should be noted as well that "post partisanship" being advanced in California in particular by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is an ascending political trend in political journals like The Nation. These new directions would well coalesce in a new framework provided by Bloomberg and the half billion of his own cash that he is willing to put up for this new venture. If so, one of the two standing parties could get a one-way ticket to Palookaville, as the Whigs did in the mid1800s.
We need Wes Clark now: If we don’t come forth now with our best managers and strategists, we may find ourselves descending into a spiral of irrelevance and caught in a twist of fate which we can no longer find our way out of.
__________________________

Clark is okay but..
Clark is okay but as far as I am concerned Gore is the last hope not only for Democrats but for America and the world.
Why would we want a man like
Why would we want a man like General Wesley Clark to lead our nation? Let's see, hum... He graduated first in his class from West Point and won a Rhodes scholarship. He led combat troops and was wounded in Vietnam. He was honored for gallantry in action, and received three medals.
He was promoted to Supreme Allied Commander and Chief of NATO forces in Europe, has a Master's degree in economics, politics and philosophy, and taught economics and political science at West Point.
He has worked as a White House Fellow in the Office of Management and the Budget. His wife is educated and will contribute to his presidency in a caring and quiet way.
This is just the a small part of his "resume".
General Wesley Clark has the intelligence, experience and ability to begin to turn around the horrendous failures of George W. Bush and his co-president, Dick Cheney.
M. King
__________________________Albuquerque
M. King
I like the general as well
I like the general as well but I would prefer him as defense secretary so he can focus full time on fixing the devastation that the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld triumvirate brought down on the military. It will take someone like General Clark with his deep respect for the military to fix it. The truth is that we have very good candidates who want to be president. We need someone with the character and stature of Wes Clark running the Pentagon.
__________________________Work and struggle and never accept an evil that you can change -- Andre Gide
I could see a Gore/Clark
I could see a Gore/Clark ticket.
__________________________First of all, I love Wesley
First of all, I love Wesley Clark. Always have. But the numbers about Hillary reinforce the point I made in my blogs: the "dream"/ideal DEM nominee (at this point) probably is not the candidate most likely to win the general election. That being the case, I think we, as a party, need to re-examine what we are looking for in our nominee. THe criteria should be, really, the candidate most likely to win the general election; even if that means foregoing the most ground-breaking nominee that we all love the most and are proud to have represent our party on the ticket.
The fact is, we are fortunate to have a slew of great candidates. So our "dream" candidate should really be the one that the nation as a whole is likely to hate the least.
QUite frankly, I am worried b/c so many Dems seem to think we will win no matter who we put on the ticket and it is that kind of thinking that put us in the minority for twelve years. We cannot afford to assume anything anymore.
__________________________"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." Margaret Mead.
So who do you think stands
So who do you think stands the best chance to win the general?
__________________________Work and struggle and never accept an evil that you can change -- Andre Gide
That's just it. It would be
That's just it. It would be like reading tea leaves at this point!
If you ask me, the candidate with the best chance to win would be a populist, who would have the ability to energize the base AND interest the independents.
__________________________In other words, the
In other words, the candidate with the best chance of winning is the one we think is the best candidate. To approach it any other way is like trying to be a fortune teller.
__________________________Clark has many strengths,
Clark has many strengths, agreed, but I am uncomfortable with having Generals in the White House. America has become increasingly militarized. The Homeland Security Agency, FISA and its secret courts, and the marketing of the military to young people are only a few examples. I want to keep civilian control of the military. Clark can serve in another capacity.